Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Regional emissions of methane and their attribution to a variety of sources presently have large uncertainties. Measurements of radiocarbon ( 14 C) in methane (CH 4 ) may provide a method for identifying regional CH 4 emissions from fossil versus biogenic sources because adding 14 C‐free fossil carbon reduces the 14 C/C ratio (Δ 14 CH 4 ) in atmospheric CH 4 much more than biogenic carbon does. We describe an approach for estimating fossil and biogenic CH 4 at regional scales using atmospheric Δ 14 CH 4 observations. As a case study to demonstrate expected Δ 14 CH 4 and Δ 14 CH 4 ‐CH 4 relationships, we simulate and compare Δ 14 CH 4 at a network of sites in California using two gridded CH 4 emissions estimates (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research, EDGAR, and Gridded Environmental Protection Agency, GEPA) and the CarbonTracker‐Lagrange model for 2014, and for 2030 under business‐as‐usual and mitigation scenarios. The fossil fraction of CH 4 (F) is closely linked with the simulated Δ 14 CH 4 ‐CH 4 slope and differences of 2–21% in median F are found for EDGAR versus GEPA in 2014, and 7–10% for business‐as‐usual and mitigation scenarios in 2030. Differences of 10% in F for >200 ppb of added CH 4 produce differences of >10‰ in Δ 14 CH 4 , which are likely detectable from regular observations. Nuclear power plant 14 CH 4 emissions generally have small simulated median influences on Δ 14 CH 4 (0–7‰), but under certain atmospheric conditions they can be much stronger (>30‰) suggesting they must be considered in applications of Δ 14 CH 4 in California. This study suggests that atmospheric Δ 14 CH 4 measurements could provide powerful constraints on regional CH 4 emissions, complementary to other monitoring techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graven et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: