Why the study?
Shared decision-making is encouraged for stable coronary artery disease, but whether improving patient-provider communication and patient knowledge alters patient preferences or the treatment chosen remains unclear.
Is better patient knowledge associated with different treatment preferences in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
Is better patient knowledge associated with different treatment preferences in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
In patients with stable CAD, increased medical knowledge from patient-provider communication does not significantly alter treatment preferences, highlighting the importance of pre-existing beliefs and demographic factors like race.
Knowledge may not shift PCI preferences in stable CAD; leaves open the role of race and beliefs in decisions.
BACKGROUND: In stable coronary artery disease (CAD), shared decision-making (SDM) is encouraged when deciding whether to pursue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) given similar cardiovascular outcomes between PCI and medical therapy. However, it remains unclear whether improving patient-provider communication and patient knowledge, the main tenets of SDM, changes patient preferences or the treatment chosen. We explored the relationships between patient-provider communication, patient knowledge, patient preferences, and the treatment received. METHODS: We surveyed stable CAD patients referred for elective cardiac catheterization at seven hospitals from 6/2016 to 9/2018. Surveys assessed patient-provider communication, medical knowledge, and preferences for treatment and decision-making. We verified treatments received by chart review. We used linear and logistic regression to examine relationships between patient-provider communication and knowledge, knowledge and preference, and preference and treatment received. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients completed the survey. More discussion of the benefits and risks of both medical therapy and PCI associated with higher patient knowledge scores (β=0.28, p<0.01). Patient knowledge level was not associated with preference for PCI (OR=0.78, 95% CI 0.57-1.03, p=0.09). Black patients had more than four times the odds of preferring medical therapy to PCI (OR=4.49, 1.22-18.45, p=0.03). Patients preferring medical therapy were not significantly less likely to receive PCI (OR=0.67, 0.16-2.52, p=0.57). CONCLUSIONS: While communicating the risks of PCI may improve patient knowledge, this knowledge may not affect patient treatment preferences. Rather, other factors such as race may be significantly more influential on a patient's treatment preferences. Furthermore, patient preferences are still not well reflected in the treatment received. Improving shared decision-making in stable CAD therefore may require not only increasing patient education but also better understanding and including a patient's background and pre-existing beliefs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: