This paper seeks to explain differences in performance among professional service firms competing in the international market. The empirical analysis focuses on a single industry within this sector: advertising. A comparison between winners and losers is used to isolate the variables with significant explanatory value. The main findings are: 1. Most important explanatory variables for variance in competitiveness among advertising agencies are measures of international activity (duration and intensity of business activity outside the domestic market); 2. Size, scope, creativity and reputation have strong explanatory value for variance in competitiveness among advertising agencies; and 3. Some of the common explanations for variance in competitiveness among manufacturing firms lack explanatory value for differences among advertising agencies (e.g., productivity per employee).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lilac Nachum (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: