Sentiment analysis, identifying polarity information (Positive, Negative, or Neutral sentiment) from textual data, is a crucial aspect of natural language understanding. However, its implementation in low resource languages like Sindhi presents significant challenges due to linguistic diversity and a limited amount of labeled data. This work addresses these challenges by proposing an ontology-driven sentiment analysis framework that integrates domain-specific ontological knowledge with the power of the Distil-BERT model for efficient sentiment classification. We constructed a custom Sindhi sentiment dataset, comprising 123 sentences annotated with three sentiment classes: Positive, Negative, and Neutral. The Distil-BERT model was employed for tokenization and sequence classification, leveraging its efficiency and adaptability for resource-constrained settings. Using Pytorch and the Hugging Face Transformers library, we trained the model with supervised pre-training arguments using the Trainer API. Additionally, a domain-specific ontology was developed to capture complex linguistic relationships and enrich the model’s semantic understanding, enabling it to handle diverse sentiment- bearing expressions effectively. Experimental results highlight the efficacy of our approach. The ontology-driven model achieved an impressive accuracy of 93%, significantly outperforming the baseline model, which achieved 82%. This improvement underscores the importance of integrating ontological knowledge, particularly in addressing the nuances of low-resource languages like Sindhi. Performance evaluation metrics, including precision, recall, and F1 Score, further validate the superior performance of the ontology-driven framework. This study presents a robust solution for sentiment analysis in Sindhi, laying the groundwork for future research in Natural Language Processing (NLP) for low-resource languages. Expanding the ontology to include more sentiment contexts and exploring hybrid deep learning approaches for sentiment classification offer promising directions for future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghaffar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: