Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research Article| July 01, 2007 Basin-wide magnetostratigraphic framework for the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming William C. Clyde; William C. Clyde 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Walid Hamzi; Walid Hamzi 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar John A. Finarelli; John A. Finarelli 2Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Scott L. Wing; Scott L. Wing 3Department of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar David Schankler; David Schankler 468 Fieldcrest Avenue, Skillman, New Jersey 08558, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Amy Chew Amy Chew 5Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information William C. Clyde 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USA Walid Hamzi 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USA John A. Finarelli 2Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA Scott L. Wing 3Department of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560, USA David Schankler 468 Fieldcrest Avenue, Skillman, New Jersey 08558, USA Amy Chew 5Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 13 Sep 2006 Revision Received: 05 Jan 2007 Accepted: 02 Mar 2007 First Online: 08 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2007) 119 (7-8): 848–859. https://doi.org/10.1130/B26104.1 Article history Received: 13 Sep 2006 Revision Received: 05 Jan 2007 Accepted: 02 Mar 2007 First Online: 08 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation William C. Clyde, Walid Hamzi, John A. Finarelli, Scott L. Wing, David Schankler, Amy Chew; Basin-wide magnetostratigraphic framework for the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. GSA Bulletin 2007;; 119 (7-8): 848–859. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/B26104.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract New paleomagnetic data from six different sections in the Bighorn Basin are combined with previously published results to construct a basin-wide magnetostratigraphic framework. Geomagnetic polarity reversals between chrons C26r, C26n, C25r, C25n, C24r, and C24n have been identified among multiple stratigraphic sections in different parts of the basin. Using the new magnetostratigraphic framework, paleontological, paleobotanical, and isotopic information from these varied locations in the basin can now be correlated and compared to similar records from elsewhere in the world. These new data resolve previous uncertainty concerning the timing of an important episode of faunal turnover known as Biohorizon B, which is slightly below the chron C24r-C24n boundary, close to the position of the Elmo isotope excursion in marine records. Backstripping analysis using these new magnetostratigraphic data helps define the time-transgressive onset of basin formation and shows the different subsidence histories of the northern and southern parts of the basin. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clyde et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: