Superexchange mechanisms, which are mostly responsible for the nnn exchange constant I2in Eu chalcogenides, are investigated in detail. In contrast with the usual 3d transition metal compounds, the Kramers-Anderson mechanism is estimated to be one order of magnitude too small to explain the experimental results due to a small 4f → 2p transfer energy. The mechanism by which a p electron is transferred to a 5d state through the d-f exchange interaction gives the correct order of magnitude for I2, with a negative sign, even though it is a sixth-order perturbation. The cross term between the above two mechanisms is shown to be nearly as important as the second mechanism and may have a positive sign. The indirect exchange mechanisms, in which the anion p level has no important role, are responsible for the nn exchange constant I1. The phonon-assisted mechanism proposed by Smit is estimated to be more than one order of magnitude smaller than the experimental value. The d-f mixing term is proved to be responsible for I1, in good agreement with experiment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
T. Kasuya (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: