Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the anti-neoplastic effect of sitagliptin alone and combined with doxorubicin, an established chemotherapeutic agent limited by ominous side effects.
Does sitagliptin alone or in combination with doxorubicin reduce tumor growth in mice with experimentally-induced mammary adenocarcinoma?
Does sitagliptin alone or in combination with doxorubicin reduce tumor growth in mice with experimentally-induced mammary adenocarcinoma?
Sitagliptin potentiates the anti-neoplastic activity of doxorubicin in a mouse model of mammary adenocarcinoma by modulating oxidative stress, inflammation, angiogenesis, and apoptosis.
Supports exploration of sitagliptin-doxorubicin combinations in oncology; does not yet inform clinical practice.
Sitagliptin (STG) is a highly selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor recently used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The current study aimed to investigate the anti-neoplastic effect of STG alone and in combination with Doxorubicin (Dox), a known chemotherapeutic agent but with ominous side effects. After intramuscular inoculation of 2 × 106 Ehrlich tumor cells, Female Swiss mice were divided into tumor-bearing control, STG-treated, Dox-treated, and a combination of STG and Dox-treated groups. The results showed a significant reduction in the tumor growth of the treated animals in comparison with those of the positive control group with a more prominent effect in the co-treated group. Where, the anti-proliferative and apoptotic effect of STG, and its chemo-sensitizing ability, when used in combination with Dox, was mediated by modulation of oxidative stress (MDA and GSH), attenuation of tumor inflammation (IL-6 and IL-1β), and angiogenesis (VEGF), suppressing proliferation (β-catenin and cyclin-D1) and enhancement of apoptosis (survivin, p53, caspase 3). Thus, in conclusion, STG as adjunctive therapy for Dox could be a strategy for the treatment of breast cancer patients, by their ability in hindering cell proliferation and minimizing the associated oxidative and inflammatory adverse reactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salama et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: