Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Seventy six senior academics from 11 countries invite The BMJ’s editors to reconsider their policy of rejecting qualitative research on the grounds of low priority. They challenge the journal to develop a proactive, scholarly, and pluralist approach to research that aligns with its stated mission
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greenhalgh et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: