Sports fields constructed on sand-based root zones are generally permeable to water and nutrients, and potential contaminants of the groundwater. This study was conducted to determine the effect of slow-release and water-soluble fertilizers on growth, nutrient uptake and leaching from a sand-based Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) turf. Two root zone mixtures and two N rates were investigated in two independent lysimeter experiments. In the first experiment (1) the 80:20 sand-peat mixture gave better growth and darker-colored turf than the 60:40 sand-peat mixture. Only RC-NPK and water-soluble NPK treatments in this experiment gave acceptable turf quality for the entire growing season. Frequent application with water-soluble fertilizer or spring application with slow-release carriers gave generally <5 mg L −1 NO 3 -N in the leachate. In the second experiment (2) application of 300 or 450 kg N ha −1 (either as spring or spring/summer application) as urea-ammonium-nitrate (UAN) (gel) did not give desirable turf growth during the entire period of investigation. Sulfur-coated urea gave generally better turf quality than UAN, but not as good as biweekly compound NPK fertilization. Irrespective of fertilizer N rate, the leaching losses of N varied from 1.1 to 2.9%, giving average NO 3 -N concentrations in the leachate for all treatments <2 mg L −1 . Sandy soil used for sports turf, and fertilized with SCU and RC-NPK, or frequent and small amounts of water-soluble N carriers, appears not to create any serious environmental concern in southern part of Norway where the rainfall is moderate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Engelsjord et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: