Why the study?
How do Ro/SSA autoantibody-positive pregnant women experience serial fetal Doppler echocardiographic surveillance?
How do Ro/SSA autoantibody-positive pregnant women experience serial fetal Doppler echocardiographic surveillance?
Serial fetal echocardiographic surveillance in Ro/SSA-positive pregnancies is generally experienced positively by mothers, though it causes stress in about a third of patients.
Supports incorporating patient experiences into Ro/SSA surveillance counseling; leaves open need for prospective studies on stress reduction.
OBJECTIVE: The risk for congenital heart block (CHB) associated with maternal Ro/SSA autoantibodies is low, but the possibility of treating early stages of disease has seen the introduction of Doppler echocardiographic surveillance programs with serial examinations during the CHB susceptibility weeks of pregnancy. The aim of the present study was to understand how Ro/SSA autoantibody-positive women having undergone Doppler echocardiographic surveillance programs and giving birth to children without CHB experienced their pregnancy and frequent ultrasound examinations. METHODS: A validated questionnaire based on data from an interview-study was distributed to Ro/SSA-positive women supervised with Doppler examinations during their pregnancy (n = 100). RESULTS: The response rate was 79%. The majority of the women (61%) reported that the increased number of ultrasound examinations influenced their pregnancy, but in a positive way, with qualified information and additional support from health care personnel in conjunction with the examinations. Further, the visits to the clinic provided opportunities to see the ultrasound picture of the expected infant. However, one-third of the women also reported stress in relation to the examinations. CONCLUSIONS: Fetal echocardiographic surveillance holds many and predominantly positive effects for Ro/SSA-positive women during pregnancy in addition to the medical advantages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tingström et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: