Why the study?
Spine surgery requires a clear field and reduced intraoperative bleeding, but the relative effects of propofol versus isoflurane combined with nitroglycerine for hypotensive anesthesia needed evaluation.
Does propofol improve surgical field clarity and decrease blood loss compared to isoflurane with nitroglycerine in patients undergoing elective spine surgery?
Does propofol improve surgical field clarity and decrease blood loss compared to isoflurane with nitroglycerine in patients undergoing elective spine surgery?
Propofol provides better surgical conditions, less blood loss, and faster recovery than isoflurane with nitroglycerine for controlled hypotensive anesthesia in spine surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Propofol-based TIVA may improve surgical conditions and recovery in spine surgery; extends RCT evidence favoring it over isoflurane-nitroglycerine for controlled hypotension.
Background: Several methods have been used to improvesurgical field clarity and decrease blood loss intraoperative;one of them is the usage of hypotensive anesthesia. Spinesurgery is one of the surgeries that need a clear field and adecreased amount of intraoperative bleeding which can impact on the ability of surgeons.Aim of Study: Current study was designed to evaluate theeffect of propofol versus isoflurane with nitroglycerine onblood loss, operative field clarity, extubation time and effectof both on tissue perfusion.Settings and Design: This study design was a prospectiverandomized controlled double blinded clinical study.Patients and Methods: 80 ASA or II patients undergoingelective spine surgery were randomly assigned to group P (n=40) that received propofol for induction and maintenancewhile group I (n=40) received thiopental for induction andisoflurane for maintenance with nitroglycerine. Heart rate,mean arterial pressure were recorded every 10min, amountof blood loss, grade of operative field clarity, extubation timeand effect of both on liver and kidney function were recorded.Results: Propofol group showed significant decrease inblood loss (p=0.01), better surgical field clarity (p=0.002)and shorter extubation time (p=0.001) than isoflurane groupbut there were no significant changes between the two groupsregarding their effect on tissue perfusion (liver and kidney).Conclusion: Propofol for elective spine surgery improvedsurgical condition and provided faster recovery compared toisoflurane even when we added an antihypertensive drug asnitroglycerine to isoflurane. Both of them had a comparableminor effect on liver and kidney functions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M.D. MOHAMED A. HAMED MOHAMED G. ABDEL TAWAB (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: