Clinical review presents the PREGO bedside ultrasound protocol for late pregnancy in emergency care, indicating improved clinical decision-making when specialists are unavailable.
Background Knowledge about a third-trimester pregnancy is essential for guiding management of a pregnant patient presenting to the emergency department (ED) in labor or with an acute obstetrical complaint. Unfortunately, patients in their third trimester may present without prenatal obstetric care or with a condition (e.g. ill, altered, or trauma) in which information about the pregnancy is not immediately available. Moreover, many rural and community hospitals do not have an obstetrician available during all hours of the day. Our proposed point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) PREGO protocol provides emergency physicians a bedside diagnostic framework to inform timely clinical decision-making. Objective This manuscript presents the PREGO protocol consisting of five transabdominal POCUS parameters for evaluating a third-trimester pregnancy in the ED. First, we describe the rationale and clinical implications for each parameter. Next, we provide the associated evidence for each parameter. Finally, we discuss common pitfalls and use high-quality media to provide step-by-step tutorials and advanced pearls for use at the bedside. Discussion The five POCUS parameters of the PREGO Protocol are: (1) Placental location (2) fetal heart Rate (3) Estimated amniotic fluid volume (4) estimated Gestational age (5) fetal Orientation. Conclusion The order and priority in which each parameter is obtained depends on the patient's clinical presentation. Use of this framework can aid in formulating a management plan, streamline communication with the obstetrics service, guide early mobilization of operative resources, inform neonatal resuscitation preparations, and determine the need for transfer to an outside hospital when indicated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beckman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: