Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The continued prevalence of different forms of collaborative working within public policy requires adaption in evaluation practices. In recent years evaluation toolkits, audits and guides have migrated online, but with varying success. At their worst, such tools can offer a disengaging user experience, limited coverage of issues or normative bias. This article outlines POETQ, designed to be engaging, comprehensive and methodologically robust. An overview of this approach is set out alongside an analysis of its merits. The article concludes by reflecting on the kinds of evidence that policy makers actually want to generate in relation to the topic of collaboration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeffares et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: