Why the study?
Does BP-747 improve antitumoral activity and reduce cardiotoxicity compared to free and pegylated epirubicin in tumor-bearing mice?
Does BP-747 improve antitumoral activity and reduce cardiotoxicity compared to free and pegylated epirubicin in tumor-bearing mice?
BP-747, a nitric oxide-releasing pegylated epirubicin, demonstrates potent antineoplastic effects without the severe cardiotoxicity associated with standard epirubicin in a mouse model.
Warrants human trials before any clinical use; leaves open whether benefits extend beyond this mouse model.
The use of epirubicin is limited by the risk of a dilatory congestive heart failure that develops as a consequence of induction of a mitochondrial-dependent cardiomyocyte apoptosis. In a previous in-vitro study, we have provided evidence that a new formulation of pegylated epirubicin- bearing moieties that release nitric oxide, named BP-747, exerted a potent antitumoral activity against a colon cancer cell line, which was completely devoid of cytotoxic activity against cardiomyocytes. The aim of this study was to investigate the antitumoral and cardiotoxic profile of BP-747 in Caco-2 and SKOV-2 tumor-bearing mice. Epirubicin-induced cardiomyopathy was detected by clinical (survival, weight loss), anatomical (heart weight loss) and biochemical evaluations (measurement of serum troponin and creatine phosphokinase levels). The antitumoral activity was investigated by the measurement of tumor diameters and weight. In comparison with free epirubicin and pegylated epirubicin, BP-747 showed more potent antineoplastic effects, as demonstrated by the 95% reduction of tumor volume. Moreover, while administration of epirubicin and pegylated epirubicin resulted in the development of a severe anthracycline cardiomyopathy, BP-747-treated mice were virtually devoid of clinical and biochemical signs of cardiotoxicity. The present data provide evidence that addition of a nitric oxide-releasing moiety to pegylated epirubicin confers a new and unique cytotoxic profile to the drug.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santucci et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: