Why the study?
The study was conducted to analyze the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Does rivaroxaban provide effective and safe outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation in real-world clinical practice?
Does rivaroxaban provide effective and safe outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation in real-world clinical practice?
Rivaroxaban demonstrates low rates of thromboembolic and bleeding events in real-world elderly patients with high thromboembolic risk, consistent with or better than clinical trial data.
Registry data align rivaroxaban-treated AF patients with prior studies; leaves open whether real-world outcomes match randomized trials.
Objective: To analyze the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: The clinical profile and outcomes of the EMIR study were indirectly compared with those of ROCKET-AF, eight other Spanish observational studies and XANTUS. Results: In EMIR, mean age was 74.2 years and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc was 3.5. In the rivaroxaban arm of the ROCKET-AF trial, mean age was 73 years and CHADS 2 was 3.5, whereas in the Spanish studies mean age ranged from 74.9 years to 78.4 years and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc from 3.5 to 4.3. In EMIR, rates of stroke/systemic embolism, major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular death and major bleeding were 0.57, 1.07, 0.63 and 1.04 events/100 patient-years, respectively. In ROCKET-AF, these numbers were 1.7, 3.91, 1.53 and 3.6 events/100 patient-years, respectively. In the Spanish studies, rates of stroke and major bleeding were 0–1.8 and 0.22–4.2 events/100 patient-years, respectively. In XANTUS, rates of stroke, major adverse cardiovascular events and major bleeding were 0.7, 1.8 and 2.1 events/100 patient-years, respectively. Conclusion: Despite the fact that rivaroxaban is prescribed for elderly patients with a high thromboembolic risk, rates of outcomes remain low.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marı́n et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: