This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Artificial intelligence (AI) encompasses computational algorithms that, partially or completely, autonomously perform beneficial tasks usually considered representative of human intelligence.[ 1 ] This revolutionary technology has the potential to shape the scope of healthcare in incredible ways. From data-driven treatment recommendations, real-time intraprocedural support, predicting outcomes, and more, there are vast possibilities for implementing AI in interventional radiology (IR) to help maximize patient care.[ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ] While there exists much enthusiasm for integrating this cutting-edge technology in IR, there are many ethical issues to consider in its use, such as questions about data ownership and distribution, culpability in the setting of AI-associated adverse events, and amplification of inequities and bias. This article explores some of these challenges and suggests a framework for navigating them. Publication History Article published online: 20 July 2023 © 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rockwell et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: