Why the study?
What are the predictors of hospital readmission in internal medicine patients based on Andersen's behavioral model?
What are the predictors of hospital readmission in internal medicine patients based on Andersen's behavioral model?
Need-related variables such as comorbidity scores and length of stay are the strongest predictors of hospital readmission in internal medicine patients, highlighting targets for discharge planning.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform readmission risk stratification in internal medicine; leaves open whether targeting need-related factors reduces events.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify predictors of internal medicine patients' readmission to hospital, using Andersen's behavioral model. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 2622 patients aged ≥18 years, who were admitted to internal medicine wards at a university hospital between 1 February 2015 and 31 January 2016. Independent variables were divided into four groups (predisposing, enabling, need, and utilization), based on Andersen's model, and included in stepwise logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Younger age, male sex, a main diagnosis of neoplasm, longer length of stay, higher comorbidity scores, and weaker coping ability predicted all readmission. Predictors of unplanned readmission included having someone to help at home following discharge, comorbidity scores, and length of stay. Predictors of unplanned, related, and preventable readmissions included having someone to help at home following discharge, having a regular physician, and the main diagnosis at discharge. The most powerful predictors influencing readmission were need-related variables. CONCLUSION: Although some predictors of readmission were unalterable, they could be used to identify high-risk patients. Innovative approaches targeting discharge planning and postdischarge care for patients with high comorbidity scores and long length of stay could reduce internal medicine patients' unplanned readmission.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaya et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: