This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
To evaluate the water replenishment effect of ecological sluices in the Tarim River’s mainstream and the water demand for ecological restoration, this study focused on the area controlled by a typical sluice group in the middle reaches. Using Landsat imagery (2000–2020) and the Penman-Monteith method, we quantified the spatiotemporal evolution of vegetation water consumption and ecological water demand, proposing corresponding sluice operation strategies. The results show: (1) From 2000 to 2020, natural vegetation consumed 1.62 × 10 8 m 3 of water on average, increasing by 0.1 × 10 8 m 3 per 5 years. Woodland and grassland expanded by 67.18 km 2 per 5 years, demonstrating effective ecological restoration. (2) Vegetation water consumption varied spatiotemporally, peaking near sluice-fed branch canals and declining with distance from the river. The highest consumption occurred in 2015, concentrated in mid-growth periods. (3) Ecological water demands were: 1.76 × 10 8 m 3 (maintaining 2020 conditions), 1.62 × 10 8 m 3 (2000–2020 average), and 2.01 × 10 8 m 3 (optimal 2015 level). By linking sluice impacts to vegetation water use and quantifying restoration needs, this study provides a scientific basis for water management and ecological regulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: