Why the study?
Acute aortic syndrome carries high mortality and lacks reliable prognostic biomarkers, and the prognostic value of the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio has not been explored in this setting.
Does the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio predict 30-day mortality in adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute aortic syndromes?
Does the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio predict 30-day mortality in adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute aortic syndromes?
A lower fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio is independently associated with increased 30-day mortality in patients presenting with acute aortic syndromes, offering a simple and cost-effective prognostic biomarker.
Background: Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is a life-threatening condition characterized by a high mortality, yet reliable prognostic biomarkers are still lacking. The fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) has recently gained attention in cardiovascular research but has not been explored in the context of AAS. This study assessed the association between the FAR and 30-day mortality in AAS patients who presented to the emergency department. Methods: We included all AAS patients aged 18 years and older who presented to the emergency department between 2013 and 2021. The outcome measured was 30-day all-cause mortality. Cox regression analysis assessed the relationship between the FAR and the outcome. Results: A total of 171 patients (mean age 67, SD 13.7; 33% female) were included, with 68 (40%) dying within 30 days of admission. Non-survivors had a significantly lower FAR (mean 8.9, SD 4.97) than survivors (mean 10.8, SD 5.44, p = 0.02). FAR was significantly associated with 30-day mortality (crude HR 0.935, 95% CI 0.88–0.99, p = 0.02). This association remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, catecholamine administration, bleeding on admission, and type of AAS (adjusted HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87–0.98, p = 0.01). Conclusions: FAR was independently associated with 30-day mortality in AAS patients who presented to the emergency department. Given its simplicity and cost-effectiveness, it could be a valuable biomarker, especially in resource-limited settings, to improve risk assessment and optimize resource allocation in AAS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lipa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: