Enclosure experiments were conducted during April. June/July and September in the eutrophc estuary Roskilde Fjord, Denmark, to reveal the effects of inorganic nutrients, suspensionfeedng bivalves Mytilus edulis and planktivorous fish (three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus) on the zooplankton community > 45 pm. The additlon of inorganic nutrients did not increase zooplankton biomass although it did increase the chlorophyll level, indicating that zooplankton production was not food hmited. Filtration by M. edulis reduced the number of tintinnid ciliates and rotifers during all 3 experiments, but not the abundance of the larger zooplankton species. Additions of planktivorous fish reduced the densities of larger zooplankton species Acartia tonsa and Pleopis polyphernoides but not of smaller species. An immense increase in numbers of A. tonsa and P. polyphernoides was observed in enclosures without fish, indicating that the larger crustacean zooplankton is strongly predator controlled. Thus, the qualitative and quantitative development of the zooplankton community in the enclosures was controlled in 2 ways; from the top of the size spectrum by G. aculeatus and from the bottom of the size spectrum by M. edulis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horsted et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: