Why the study?
Does targeting therapy to Power Doppler activity improve outcomes compared with treating to clinical targets alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?
Does targeting therapy to Power Doppler activity improve outcomes compared with treating to clinical targets alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?
Power Doppler ultrasonography is an attractive marker for subclinical synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis, though further validation on patient outcomes and standardized training are needed.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change RA practice; leaves open whether Power Doppler-guided targeting improves outcomes over clinical targets alone.
Structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) occurs early if inflammation is not treated promptly. Treatment targeted to reduce inflammation, in particular, that of synovial inflammation in the joints (synovitis), has been recommended as standard treat-to-target recommendations by rheumatologists. The goal is to achieve disease remission (i.e., no disease activity). Several accepted remission criteria have not always equated to the complete absence of true inflammation. Over the last decade, musculoskeletal ultrasonography has been demonstrated to detect subclinical synovitis not appreciated by routine clinical or laboratory assessments, with the Power Doppler modality allowing clinicians to more readily appreciate true inflammation. Thus, targeting therapy to Power Doppler activity may provide superior outcomes compared with treating to clinical targets alone, making it an attractive marker of disease activity in RA. However, more validation on its true benefits such as its benefits to patients in regard to patient related outcomes and issues with standardized training in acquisition and interpretation of power Doppler findings are required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhasin et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: