Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Stereoselective disposition of omeprazole and its formed 5-hydroxy metabolite were studied in five poor metabolizers and five extensive metabolizers of S-mephenytoin. After a single oral dose of omeprazole (20 mg), the plasma concentrations of the separate enantiomers of the parent drug and the 5-hydroxy metabolite were determined for 10 hours after drug intake. In poor metabolizers, the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve [AUC(0-8)] of (+)-omeprazole was larger and that of the 5-hydroxy metabolite of this enantiomer was smaller than the AUC(0-8) values in extensive metabolizers (p < 0.001). The mean AUC(0-8) of the (-)-enantiomer of omeprazole was also higher in poor metabolizers than in extensive metabolizers, but only 3.1-fold compared with 7.5-fold for (+)-omeprazole. The rate of formation of the hydroxy metabolite from (-)-omeprazole was low and not significantly different in poor and extensive metabolizers. These results show that (+)-omeprazole is to a major extent hydroxylated by CYP2C19. Also (-)-omeprazole may partly be metabolized by this enzyme but is mainly metabolized by another enzyme, presumably CYP3A4, to the achiral sulfone metabolite. The plasma concentration ratio of omeprazole to 5-hydroxyomeprazole obtained 3 hours after the drug intake has been used to distinguish between extensive and poor metabolizer phenotypes. With use of the ratio between the (+)-enantiomers of the parent drug and the metabolite, a better discrimination between phenotypes was obtained. The ratio between the (-)-enantiomers also separated the phenotypes but was less discriminatory. For the future, measurement of total concentrations will suffice for phenotyping.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tybring et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: