In this article, manganese oxide nanorods with different crystalline structures, i.e., β-MnO 2, α-Mn 2 O 3, and a composite of Mn 3 O 4 and α-Mn 2 O 3, were successfully synthesized via controlling the heat-treatment procedure starting from a manganese oxide composite, containing γ-MnOOH and Mn(OH) 4 . The oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) polarization curves measured by a rotating disk electrode (RDE) setup show that those MnO x catalysts with higher Mn valent states, i.e., γ-MnOOH and Mn(OH) 4 composite and β-MnO 2, exhibit better catalytic activity toward the ORR than those with lower Mn valences. Furthermore, we testify that the surface Mn valence of MnO x could be tuned by applying proper potential cycling to the MnO x electrode and thus leads to different activities, i.e., the MnO x surface is rich in Mn(II) after treatment at relatively negative potentials, resulting in degradation in ORR activity, while it is rich in Mn(IV) after treatment at positive potentials, resulting in improvement in activity. Compared with the heat-treatment approach, the electrochemical approach is more facile and energy-saving to tune the surface metal valence and thus ORR activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: