Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Modeling analysis demonstrates calculation inconsistencies in standard Lee–Kesler fluid evaluations, highlighting improved thermodynamic accuracy across carbon dioxide state spaces.
Accurate thermodynamic models of nonideal fluids are essential tools. Beyond the need for better predictive capabilities, their rigorous, thermodynamically-consistent implementation and use within property calculation workflows are a strict prerequisite to obtain physically meaningful and interpretable results. This article identifies inconsistencies in the original property calculation framework of the well-established Lee-Kesler model and proposes a thermodynamically-consistent, ready-to-use approach. In addition to the theoretical proof and discussion on consistency, a numerical analysis is presented to provide empirical evidence for the theoretical findings. The magnitude of errors are evaluated and depicted within a wide state space, using the example of CO 2 as modeled substance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gentsch et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: