Why the study?
Antiplatelets are often used before DOAC initiation following acute AF-related ischemic stroke, but evidence supporting this practice is weak.
Does antiplatelet use before DOAC initiation reduce the composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and vascular death in patients with atrial fibrillation-associated ischemic stroke?
Does antiplatelet use before DOAC initiation reduce the composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and vascular death in patients with atrial fibrillation-associated ischemic stroke?
In patients with atrial fibrillation-associated ischemic stroke, using antiplatelets before DOAC initiation is associated with a lower risk of stroke recurrence without net harm, despite an increased risk of bleeding.
Should not yet change antiplatelet bridging before DOAC after AF-stroke; leaves open trials confirming net benefit.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Antiplatelets are often used before direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) initiation after an acute ischemic stroke related to atrial fibrillation (AF), but the evidence is weak. Here, we explored the risks and benefits of this approach. METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of ELAN (Early versus Late Initiation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Post-ischemic Stroke Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) trial data (NCT03148457) was conducted to compare the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding (extracranial or intracranial hemorrhage [ICH]), and vascular death within 30 days (as a composite and as individual outcomes) in participants treated with and without antiplatelets before DOAC initiation after an AF-associated ischemic stroke. We used both logistic and cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression in inverse probability of treatment weighted models to account for confounding. We calculated the net benefit of antiplatelet use by subtracting the weighted rate of excess bleeding events attributable to antiplatelets from the rate of excess ischemic events possibly prevented by antiplatelets. RESULTS: Among 2,013 participants (median age 77 years, 45.5% female), 1,090 (54.1%) used antiplatelets, and 70 (3.5%) experienced the composite outcome. Antiplatelet use was not associated with the composite outcome (inverse probability of treatment weighted odds ratio [ORweighted] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-1.72; inverse probability of treatment weighted hazard ratio [HRweighted] 1.06, 95% CI 0.65-1.72), but showed a lower risk of ischemic stroke recurrence (ORweighted 0.58 [0.30-1.08], HRweighted 0.57 [0.30-1.10]), and a higher risk of major bleeding (ORweighted 1.76 [0.56-6.63], HRweighted 1.88 [0.56-6.39]). Its net benefit was +0.57 (95% CI -1.25 to +2.34) to +0.30 (-1.82 to +2.27) weighted events/100 person-months for ICH weights 1.5 to 3.1. CONCLUSION: Following an AF-associated ischemic stroke, we found a lower risk of recurrence and no signs of net harm with antiplatelet use before DOAC initiation, despite an increased risk of bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polymeris et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: