Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SUMMARY 1. Leaf packs in streams may serve as food and substrate to many macroinvertebrates, but the relative importance of these two functions has not been disentangled. To test the hypothesis that leaf packs are colonized primarily for their food value rather than as microhabitat, the colonization of leaf packs of red alder and of polyester cloth in a natural stream was compared. 2. Species of shredders showed large differences in the colonization of the two types of leaf pack with almost no use of artificial leaf packs. Non‐shredders were also more abundant on natural leaf packs, however, they colonized artificial leaf packs six to eighty times proportionally more than shredders. 3. The effect of different leaf types was virtually eliminated for non‐shredders when the amount of fine parriculate detritus (food for many non‐shredders) trapped in the leaf pack was added to the analysis as a covariate. Therefore, to non‐shredders, leaf types differed only in the retention of fine particulate organic matter. 4. Comparisons of the use of both kinds of leaf packs in riffles versus pools revealed that significantly fewer animals colonized pool leaf packs. 5. These results suggest that food value, and not microhabitat, is the primary determinant of leaf pack use for most shredders and non‐shredders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John S. Richardson (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: