Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A comparison of Helios 1 and 2 observations of the interplanetary sector pattern in early 1976 with the maximum brightness curves in the K coronameter data at 1.5 R S shows that the latter may be identified with the footprints of the sector boundary surface to an accuracy of ≈ 10°. The neutral line computed by Wilcox et al (1980) from a potential field model, using Mt. Wilson photospheric magnetic field measurements and a source surface at 2.6 R S , is similar in shape to the K coronameter maximum brightness curves but extends to higher latitudes. The Helios observations give better agreement with the K coronameter curves for the one solar rotation on which a test of the latitutude extent of the neutral line was possible. The K coronameter results and the Helios data show that the sector boundary surface probably extended to ≈ 15° in the northern hemisphere and to ≈ 30° in the southern hemisphere, with little change between 1.5 R S and 1 AU. The surface was warped appreciably from a single tilted plane (a dipole configuration) suggesting a significant magnetic quadrupole contribution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burlaga et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: