Why the study?
Preoperative medical consults add expense and burden with conflicting impact on outcomes, and 10-40% of recommendations are not followed, limiting outcome measurement and representing a quality gap.
Nearly half of perioperative medical consultation recommendations are not followed by surgical teams, driven by both unintentional systems-level factors and intentional clinical adaptations.
Highlights an implementation quality gap that may dilute consult value; leaves open prospective tests of barrier-targeted interventions.
Background : Preoperative medical consultations add expense and burden for patients and the impact of these consults on patient outcomes is conflicting. Previous work suggests that 10-40% of preoperative medical consult recommendations are not followed. This limits measurement of the effect of perioperative medical consultation on patient outcomes and represents a quality gap, given the patient time and healthcare cost associated with consultation. We aimed to measure, characterize, and understand reasons for missed recommendations from preoperative medical consultation. Methods: This explanatory, sequential mixed methods study used chart audits followed by semi-structured interviews. Chart audit of consecutive patients seen in preoperative medical clinic were reviewed to measure the proportion and characterize the type of recommendations that were not completed (‘missed’). This phase informed the interview participants and questions. The interview guide was developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Template analysis was used to understand drivers and barriers of missed recommendations Results: Chart audit included 295 patients (n=188, 63.7% female) seen in preadmission clinic between April 1 and April 30th, 2019. 51.8% of patients all recommendations followed (n=142). Postoperative anticoagulation management and postoperative cardiac biomarker surveillance recommendations were least commonly followed (45.2%; n=28, and 64.1%; n=84, respectively). Eighteen surgical team members were interviewed. Missed recommendations were both unintentional and intentional, and the key drivers differed by these categories. Unintentionally missed recommendations occurred due to individual-level factors (drivers: knowledge of the consultation note, lack of routine for reviewing the consultation note, and competing demands on time) and systems-level factors (drivers: lack of role clarity). Intentionally missed recommendations occurred due to user error due (drivers: lack of knowledge of guidelines or evidence) and appropriate modifications (drivers: need to adapt a preoperative plan for a complicated postoperative course). Conclusions: Only 51.8% of consult notes had all recommendations followed, suggesting a quality gap in perioperative medical care. Qualitative data suggests multiple drivers of missed recommendations that should be targeted to improve the efficiency of care for these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Flemons et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: