Recently, surgeons have begun to treat serious congenital craniofacial deformities including craniosynostoses with mechanical devices that gradually distract the skull. As a prospective means of treatment planning for such complex deformities, FE models derived from routine preoperative CT scans (CT/FEA) would provide ideal patient specific engineering analyses. The purpose of this study was to assess the dimensional and predictive accuracy of the CT/FEA process through the development of a 3D model of a dry human calvarium subjected to two-point distraction ex vivo. Comparative skull measurements revealed that CT/FEA construction error did not exceed 1% for transcranial dimensions, and the thickness error did not exceed 8.66% or 0.31 mm. CT/FEA strain predictions for the central region of the skull, between the distraction posts, were not statistically different from homologous gage values at P < 0.05. Peripherally, however, the strain fields were less well behaved and the FE predictions showed only general qualitative agreement with gage recordings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Remmler et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: