Why the study?
AF and stable CAD frequently coexist, but the long-term outcome of catheter ablation in patients with both paroxysmal AF and stable CAD required assessment.
Does stable coronary artery disease increase the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence and adverse clinical events after catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Does stable coronary artery disease increase the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence and adverse clinical events after catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
The presence of stable coronary artery disease in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation is associated with a significantly higher risk of AF recurrence and thromboembolic events.
Should not yet change ablation candidacy in SCAD; leaves open whether tailored surveillance reduces recurrence and thromboembolism.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) frequently coexist. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcome of catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF and SCAD. METHODS: In total, 12,104 patients with paroxysmal AF underwent catheter ablation in the Chinese Atrial Fibrillation Registry between 2011 and 2019 were screened. A total of 441 patients with SCAD were matched with patients without SCAD in a 1:4 ratio. The primary endpoint was AF recurrence after single ablation. The composite secondary endpoints were thromboembolism, coronary events, major bleeding, all-cause death. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 46.0 ± 18.9 months, the recurrence rate in patients with SCAD was significantly higher after a single ablation (49.0% vs. 41.9%, p = .03). The very late recurrence rate of AF in the SCAD group was also significantly higher than that in the control group (38.9% vs. 31.2%;p = .04). In multivariate analysis, adjusted with the female, smoking, duration of AF, previous thromboembolism, COPD, and statins, SCAD was independently associated with AF recurrence (adjusted HR, 1.19 [1.02-1.40], p = .03). The composite secondary endpoints were significantly higher in the SCAD group (12.70% vs. 8.54%, p = .02), mainly due to thromboembolism events (8.16% vs. 4.41%, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: SCAD significantly increased the risk of recurrence after catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF. The incidence of thromboembolic events after catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF in the patients with SCAD was significantly higher than that in those without SCAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: