Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Based on the established task of identifying boosted, hadronically decaying top quarks, we compare a wide range of modern machine learning approaches. Unlike most established methods they rely on low-level input, for instance calorimeter output. While their network architectures are vastly different, their performance is comparatively similar. In general, we find that these new approaches are extremely powerful and great fun.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2019 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: