Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND/STUDY CONTEXT: The purpose was to determine if aging interacts with the coding of a simple spatial-temporal movement sequence. METHODS: An interlimb practice paradigm (24 participants; 12 young adults [age: 23-29]; 12 old adults [age: 65-78]) was designed to determine the coordinate system (visual-spatial/motor) that is used to code the movement sequence. Practice was scheduled over 2 days involving either the same visual-spatial or the same motor coordinates. On Day 3, two retention tests (Day 1/Day 2) were conducted. RESULTS: Keeping the motor coordinates the same during acquisition resulted in superior retention only for younger adults. CONCLUSION: The data provide strong evidence that the motor code plays a dominant role in acquiring simple movement sequences for younger adults, but not for older adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panzer et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: