Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Infrared photodissociation spectra of several phenol−L n cation clusters (Ph + −L n; L = He, Ne, Ar, N 2, CH 4 ) are recorded in the vicinity of the O−H stretch vibration (ν 1 ) of bare Ph + . The Ph + −L n complexes are produced in an electron impact (EI) ion source, which generates predominantly the most stable isomer of each cluster ion. The spectra of all dimers ( n = 1) show strong ν 1 transitions (at 3537, 3534, 3464, 3365, 3365 cm -1 for L = He, Ne, Ar, N 2, CH 4 ), which are attributed to proton-bound structures based upon the complexation-induced redshifts, Δν 1 . A linear correlation between Δν 1 and the proton affinity of L is observed. In the case of Ph + −Ar, a weak transition at 3536 cm -1 is assigned to the ν 1 band of the less stable π-bound isomer. The analysis of photofragmentation branching ratios and systematic frequency shifts in the spectra of larger Ph + −L n clusters ( n ≤ 2 for CH 4, n ≤ 5 for Ar, n ≤ 7 for N 2 ) provide information about the microsolvation process of Ph + in nonpolar environments. The ν 1 transitions of the most stable isomers display small incremental blueshifts with respect to the dimer transitions, suggesting that further solvation causes little destabilization of the intermolecular proton bond to the first ligand. In the case of the Ph + −(N 2 ) n complexes, the existence of two isomers is observed in the size range n = 5−7. For several Ph + −L n clusters, the most stable cation structures produced in the EI source differ considerably from the geometries observed by resonant enhanced multiphoton ionization (REMPI) of the corresponding neutral precursors. The limitations of REMPI techniques (arising from the Franck-Condon principle) for the generation and spectroscopic characterization of cluster cations are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solcà et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: