Why the study?
What are the long-term outcomes and predictors of reintervention following initial aortic valve intervention in pediatric patients with congenital aortic stenosis?
What are the long-term outcomes and predictors of reintervention following initial aortic valve intervention in pediatric patients with congenital aortic stenosis?
Initial aortic valve intervention for congenital aortic stenosis provides excellent long-term survival, but is associated with a high rate of reintervention driven by residual gradient and regurgitation.
May warrant intensified surveillance for residual gradient or AR in children; leaves open optimal reintervention thresholds.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate long-term outcome of initial aortic valve intervention in a paediatric population with congenital aortic stenosis, and to determine risk factors associated with reintervention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1985 to 2009, 77 patients with congenital aortic stenosis and a mean age of 5.8±5.6 years at diagnosis were followed up in our institution for 14.8±9.1 years. RESULTS: First intervention was successful with 86% of patients having a residual peak aortic gradient 1 regurgitation increased by 7%. Long-term survival after the first procedure was excellent, with 91% survival at 25 years. At a mean interval of 7.6±5.3 years, 30 patients required a reintervention (39%), mainly because of a recurrent aortic stenosis. Freedom from reintervention was 97, 89, 75, 53, and 42% at 1, 10, 15, 20, and 25 years, respectively. Predictors of reintervention were residual peak aortic gradient (p=0.0001), aortic regurgitation post-intervention >1 (p=0.02), prior balloon aortic valvuloplasty (p=0.04), and increased left ventricular posterior wall thickness (p=0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve intervention is a safe and effective procedure for congenital aortic stenosis with excellent survival results. However, rate of reintervention is high and influenced by increased left ventricular posterior wall thickness pre-intervention, prior balloon valvuloplasty, higher residual peak systolic valve gradient, and more than mild regurgitation post-intervention. The study highlights that long-term follow-up is recommended for these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hochstrasser et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: