In many laboratories, microscopy of urines is restricted to specimens selected on the basis of positive tests, mainly for protein, blood, nitrite, and leukocyte esterase. Here, we analyzed several hundred specimens by use of multiple dipsticks, read in an improved reflectometer. By comparing the results with quantitative microscopy, it could be shown that this system allows selection, with acceptable sensitivity and specificity, of those specimens that are likely to contain clinically important microscopic elements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kutter et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: