Systematic review with meta‐analysis: Chromoendoscopy versus white light endoscopy in detection of dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVE: To compare chromoendoscopy (CE) and white light endoscopy (WLE) for dysplasia surveillance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 5 prospective studies and compared the CE and WLE groups. A fixed-effect model was used unless the heterogeneity was high. RESULTS: CE detected more patients with dysplasia (relative risk [RR] 2.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.62-2.61) and more dysplastic lesions (RR 2.04, 95% CI: 1.40-2.98) than WLE. When magnification was added to CE, the detection rate of patients with dysplasia and dysplastic lesions improved. CE also detected more patients with dysplasia than high-definition WLE (RR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.11-2.29). Compared with WLE, the incremental yield of CE for detecting patients with dysplasia was 9%. CE was superior to WLE in detecting non-polypoid dysplastic lesions (RR 1.38, 95% CI:1.02-1.88). CE had no advantage for detecting polypoid dysplastic lesions compared with WLE. CONCLUSIONS: CE is superior to WLE in the surveillance of dysplasia in IBD patients. It is thus necessary to use CE in the surveillance of dysplasia in patients with IBD in clinical practice. Adding magnification improves the detection rate.