Comparative paleoecological analysis reveals distinctive swidden pollen signatures in buried forest soils versus peat archives, highlighting localized proxies for ancient agriculture.
This study compares evidence of slash-and-burn agriculture in pollen spectra from soils and aquatic archives in the southern forest zone of Eastern Europe. Pollen assemblages from buried swidden soils (500-1800 cal BP) were analysed alongside coeval peat layers and modern surface soils. Swidden horizons show highly distinctive pollen spectra characterised by Betula dominance, low conifer representation, and the co-occurrence of cultivation indicators (Cerealia-type) and post-fire taxa (Chamaenerion, Pteridium, Marchantia). The high abundance of the insect-pollinated Chamaenerion angustifolium likely reflects both its prevalence in swidden landscapes and its accumulation through ground-nesting bee activity, providing an additional proxy for identifying buried swiddens. In peat records, the onset of slash-and-burn agriculture is indicated by increased microcharcoal, decline of late-successional trees, expansion of pioneer taxa, and the appearance of agricultural indicators. Betula dominance in both archives reflects secondary stands during fallow stages. However, cultivation and post-fire signals are much weaker in peat sequences. These results show that paleosol pollen spectra provide robust, site-specific evidence of swidden agriculture, whereas peat records reflect broader regional pollen rain and detect such activity only indirectly. The study provides a methodological framework for identifying and localising ancient agricultural practices in palaeoecological and archaeological research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ershova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: