Theoretical economic model demonstrates distortions from self-preferencing in dual-role AI routing platforms, highlighting the need for audited routing and data access governance.
This paper develops an industrial-organization theory of AI routing in which a dual-role platform allocates queries between its in-house model and an outside expert. The expert chooses an access price and initial quality, while early expert traffic raises later quality through learning-by-serving. The closed-form equilibrium has a difficulty cutoff in each period. A larger self-preferencing benefit raises the cutoff and reduces expert demand and quality investment; stronger data feedback raises expert investment but also increases the sensitivity of quality and traffic to self-preferencing. Relative to the conditional dynamic first best, the exact period-1 traffic shortfall is the sum of an access-markup wedge, a bias wedge, and a positive data-feedback wedge. Thus neutrality and marginal-cost access remove only the first two distortions. A practical implication is that governance should combine ownership-neutral routing criteria and cost-based access with logged, independently testable routing decisions and controlled external-model trials that preserve learning opportunities. The framework identifies what such audits must measure and clarifies the implementation limits created by stochastic performance, latent costs, and diminishing returns to data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: