Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental evaluation demonstrates accurate label-free defect detection in high-speed rail wheels using physics-guided diffusion models, highlighting reliable screening in noisy conditions.
Ensuring the structural integrity of high-speed rail wheels is essential for operational safety, yet automated ultrasonic testing is constrained by scarce defect samples, costly pixel-level annotation, and complex field noise. This study proposes a physics-guided ultrasonic anomaly-detection framework with defect-label-free training based on diffusion models. A physics-guided multi-channel representation incorporates probe configurations, ultrasonic propagation paths, overlapping inspection regions, and wheel geometry. A frequency-domain adaptive loss preserves defect-sensitive spectral information, while an uncertainty-aware scoring strategy combines reconstruction residuals, diffusion-induced predictive uncertainty, and physically defined regions of interest. The diffusion model is trained exclusively on 6000 normal ultrasonic B-scan images without defective training samples or pixel-level defect annotations. For independent evaluation, defect-related echo regions in test images are annotated and cross-checked by three experienced ultrasonic specialists. Pixel-level evaluation achieves an AUROC of 0.972, an F1-score of 0.953, an IoU of 0.815, and an FPR of 0.024 at a TPR of 0.95. Preliminary on-site trial testing and offline validation using data from an operational high-speed rail wheel inspection system demonstrate the potential of the proposed method for reliable defect screening under noisy field conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: