Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative focus group study identifies key factors for effective avian conservation, demonstrating that co-development and community engagement bridge the divide between research and action.
Conservation science struggles with an ongoing divide between research and action. Given its history of broad public engagement and multi‐scale management coordination, avian conservation typifies many of the challenges, successes, and opportunities across the broader field of conservation and is rich with examples that may guide solutions‐oriented conservation science. In semi‐structured focus groups composed of bird conservation scientists and practitioners from various backgrounds, we discussed the definition, characteristics, and examples of solutions‐oriented conservation science. Our discussions highlighted several examples where successful application of avian conservation science led to change in programs, policy, regulations, and social systems, including several with co‐benefits for local communities. These successes were characterized by communication, collaboration, and co‐development with local communities, decision‐makers, practitioners, and Indigenous communities. We identified remaining opportunities for improvement, including aligning incentives and priorities between research and practice, working across disciplines to mobilize solutions, dismantling barriers to inclusion, and emphasizing the importance of relationship‐building in conservation science. We outline suggestions that researchers can use to incorporate these lessons from solutions‐oriented avian conservation science into training and mentoring programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buxton et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: