Experimental study reveals dynamic contact stress correlates with rebound in fresh dry-mix shotcrete, indicating early-age surface fluidity reduces material loss.
Dry-mix shotcrete rebound depends not only on spray kinematics but also on the early-age response of the receiving-surface during placement. This paper presents a full-scale on-panel experimental approach to characterize this response and relate it to rebound within one controlled dry-mix shotcrete material–equipment system. In this study, the term fluid zone denotes a hypothesized transient, localized, low-resistance near-surface region beneath the spray axis, identified from a wet/glossy appearance and lower on-panel dynamic contact stress ( pd p d ) measured by a dynamic bead-impact test. A robot-mounted, 3D-printed magnetic catapult and high-speed imaging were used to measure pd p d on the panel at 0.5 s after the nozzle passage and again at 3 and 6 min. Full-scale dry-mix spraying tests with controlled nozzle motion and real-time mass/flow measurements were conducted using a reference mixture and two air-entrained mixtures over a range of placement consistencies represented by (w/b)calc w / b calc . Under the tested setup, pd p d at 0.5 s was consistently lower than later values, providing indirect mechanical evidence consistent with a rapidly evolving low-resistance near-surface response. Lower early-age pd p d was associated with lower rebound. Air entrainment shifted both pd p d and rebound downward, while higher (w/b)calc w / b calc toward the upper end of the accepted placement range were associated with lower rebound. The proposed on-panel test provides a comparative indicator of early-age receiving-surface response during dry-mix shotcrete placement. Although broader validation is required (equipment, mixture design, etc.), this measurement method appears to be a significant improvement of our understanding of rebound mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: