Pilot study demonstrates that sensor-derived jerk metrics correlate with standard skill scores in wheelchair users, highlighting an objective method to assess driving performance.
Background Current assessments of electric-powered wheelchair (EPW) driving, such as the Wheelchair Skills Test (WST), rely on observational scoring and lack validation in outdoor environments. Occupational Therapists require standardized, quantitative measures to evaluate driving performance and monitor training progress. Objective This pilot study examined: (1) the influence of cognitive, physical, and sensory components on EPW driving, (2) the validity of sensor-derived jerk metrics relative to WST scores, and (3) the feasibility of these metrics as outcome measures in an EPW training program. Methods Seven adults with mobility impairments (six novice wheelchair drivers; mean age 59.4 years) completed baseline assessments. Sensors mounted on the EPW and joystick captured jerk during seven WST tasks with Apps displayed. Three metrics—median jerk, time above threshold, and the Jerk Index—were computed and correlated with WST scores. Pre/post comparisons were conducted following four training sessions. Results Sensor-derived metrics demonstrated strong inverse correlations with WST scores (ρ = −0.750 to −0.857, p < 0.05), indicating that lower jerk values reflected higher skill. The Jerk Index correlated significantly with WST scores in outdoor tasks (ρ = −0.786, p < 0.05). After training ( N = 4), WST scores improved by 21.3% and the Jerk Index decreased by 20.6%, though changes did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions Jerk-based metrics, particularly the Jerk Index, show promise as objective measures of EPW driving performance. They demonstrated concurrent validity with WST scores and applicability in outdoor contexts. Larger studies are warranted to confirm reliability, establish clinical thresholds, and support integration into rehabilitation practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: