Theoretical analysis reveals that quadratic zero closure restricts systems to a four-dimensional light cone and Stiefel manifold, highlighting conserved geometric invariants across dynamical states.
An interpretive note. No new theorems are claimed. Known results are rearranged under the single closure condition Sum x_n^2 = 0 in order to fix what is determined by it and what is not. Claim 0 shows that central projection reduces the many-body zero-closure problem to a single quadratic equality constraint, and that this reduction survives complexification: writing z = q + ip, zero closure is equivalent to |q|^2 = |p|^2 together with q.p = 0, so at fixed C the solution set is the Stiefel manifold of orthonormal 2-frames. Claim 2B states the title of the paper: the basic representation is the four-dimensional (r, t, R, Q), on which zero closure imposes the light cone r^2 - t^2 - R^2 - Q^2 = 0. Claims 4 to 9 collect the geometric statements (parallelotopes satisfy the signed closure, the inertia ellipsoid saturates at multipole l <= 2, complex numbers are not mandatory). Claims 10 to 18 report measurements on the numerical model of the series at resolution N = 16 = 2^4 with T = 40000 steps: the transition at tau about 9000, the 15 principal axes, the conserved signed trace, and the diffusion of principal-axis orientation together with the quadratic forms that survive it. Undischarged assumptions are stated explicitly throughout.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noriaki Kihara (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: