Theoretical analysis demonstrates exact realification across de Rham theory, characteristic classes, and gauge curvature, revealing a structure-preserving bridge between complex and real geometry.
This work develops a differential-geometric extension of the Conjugation–Real Embedding (CRE), an explicit real block representation introduced previously within the AXIOM (Algebraic eXtension by Index–Ordered Multiplication) framework. Starting from three primitive properties of CRE—multiplicativity, vector compatibility, and coefficientwise commutation with the exterior derivative—we establish a unified CRE Geometric Intertwining Theorem. The resulting realification intertwines the de Rham complex; Hodge star, codifferential, and Hodge Laplacian for real Riemannian metrics; complex-linear connections and curvature; parallel transport and holonomy; Chern–Weil representatives; Chern–Simons transgression; and operator commutators. The framework gives an explicit block-level realization of classical characteristic-class relations. Under the splitting principle, a formal Chern root x_j is represented by the skew block x_j J_2. Its square yields the quadratic root data underlying Pontryagin classes, while its Pfaffian yields the Euler/top-Chern contribution. As a four-dimensional application, the framework is specialized to SU(2) bundles. CRE preserves self-duality and anti-self-duality of curvature, and the second-Chern/instanton charge is exactly recoverable from the realified curvature after the required real-trace normalization. The work distinguishes these CRE-specific intertwining and representation results from the underlying classical theory of realification, characteristic classes, and SU(2) gauge geometry. CRE does not flatten curved geometry or alter the physical value of Planck’s constant; rather, it provides an explicit structure-preserving correspondence between complex geometric/operator data and real orthogonal representations equipped with a distinguished complex structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Junhu Park (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: