This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: The distinction between high-grade neuroendocrine G3 tumors (G3 NETs) and carcinomas (NECs) is a critical diagnostic dilemma with profound therapeutic implications. Conventional Ki67 hotspot analysis often fails to provide robust risk stratification. We aimed to develop and validate a robust, interpretable digital pathology biomarker that overcomes these limitations to improve risk stratification and guide therapeutic decisions. METHODS: We developed the Integrated Local-Global Ki67 (IL-GKi67) score, which synergizes localized hotspot quantification with global intratumoral heterogeneity assessment from Ki67-stained whole-slide images. The score's prognostic and predictive performance was rigorously evaluated in a multicenter cohort (N = 349) with internal and external validation sets. RESULTS: The IL-GKi67 score was a powerful and independent prognostic factor, where high scores correlated with drastically worse overall survival (multicenter validation: HR = 4.169, P = 0.009), remaining significant where the traditional hotspot method failed (P = 0.128). Most importantly, IL-GKi67 functioned as a definitive predictive biomarker. Patients with low IL-GKi67 scores derived a profound survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (mOS: 45.0 months, at 50 months, the restricted mean survival time of chemo subset was 48.9 months (95% CI, 45.36 to 52.02); HR = 0.069, P = 0.002), an effect particularly pronounced in the aggressive NEC subgroup (HR = 0.061, P < 0.001). The score served as a powerful morphological surrogate for TP53 mutation status (P < 0.001) and refined the conventional G3 NET/NEC classification by re-stratifying a substantial portion of patients into more clinically relevant risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: IL-GKi67 is an interpretable and validated digital biomarker that overcomes the limitations of manual Ki67 assessment. By integrating local and global proliferation patterns, it improves risk stratification and provides a practical tool to guide personalized adjuvant chemotherapy decisions for patients with HGNENs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: