The prey intake of larval carp is described from high‐speed (200–1250 frames s −1 ) films with synchronous lateral and ventral views. Even in first‐feeding carp larvae, the operculars are functional in sealing effectively the opercular slit until the moment of prey intake, and the maxillaries close off the corners of the mouth, preventing leak flow. In reducing the distance between larva and prey during attack, the relative importance of sucking the prey towards the mouth and swimming forward is variable; overall they are about equally important. The volume and the velocity of the water sucked into the mouth cavity during prey uptake are calculated. The energy costs of suction, i.e., accelerating the water sucked into the mouth cavity, during prey intake are estimated from these values. The energy costs of suction and swimming are in the same order of magnitude. Together they form only a fraction of 1% of the energetic content of the prey, so considerations about energy expenditure seem unimportant in a strategy to optimize the prey attack. During searching, however, they will be important. Power requirements during attack may also be important.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Drost et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: