Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Objectives: this study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 5-day preoperative enteral or oral immunonutrition in patients undergoing major surgery for gastrointestinal cancer, under the Brazilian Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS) perspective. A budget impact analysis was also performed. Methods: a decision tree model was built to compare enteral or oral immunonutrition with the standard diet, considering a time horizon of 5 + 30 days. To determine the efficacy outcomes, studies using 5-day preoperative immunonutrition were retrieved from a previously published meta-analysis. New combined estimates for the occurrence of infectious complications, non-infectious complications, length of stay, and 30-day mortality were calculated using studies with a 5-day period intervention. Treatment strategies were compared using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Costs were reported in Brazilian reals (BRL) and euros (EUR). Results: results combined through the meta-analysis showed that the occurrence of infectious complications was 17.2 % (65/378) and 28.8 % (99/344) for the immunonutrition and the control group, respectively (OR = 0.46; 95 % CI = 0.28-0.78; p = 0.003). Considering total costs by procedure, estimates of 930.56 BRL/151.31 EUR (267.75 BRL/43.54 EUR due to immunonutrition and 662.81 BRL/107.77 EUR due to infectious complications management) and 1,109.29 BRL/180.37 EUR (0.0 BRL/EUR due to standard diet and 1,109.29 BRL/180.37 EUR due to infectious complications management) were observed for immunonutrition and standard diet groups, respectively. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed that immunonutrition reduced the occurrence of infectious complications (-12 %) with lower costs (-178.73 BRL/-29.06 EUR). Total savings over 5 years was approximately 5 million BRL/817,352 EUR. Conclusion: 5-day preoperative enteral or oral immunonutrition not only has a positive clinical impact for patients undergoing major surgery for gastrointestinal cancer but can also generate substantial reductions in costs for SUS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fahham et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: