Key result
LCZ696 provided greater protection against diabetic cardiomyopathy than valsartan by inhibiting myocardial inflammation, ER stress, and apoptosis through AGEs/NF-κB and PERK/CHOP signaling cascades.
Why the study?
The study was designed to determine the effect of LCZ696 on diabetic cardiomyopathy in rats and investigate the underlying mechanism involved.
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce myocardial inflammation, ER stress, and apoptosis in a rat model of diabetic cardiomyopathy?
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce myocardial inflammation, ER stress, and apoptosis in a rat model of diabetic cardiomyopathy?
In a rat model of diabetic cardiomyopathy, sacubitril/valsartan provided greater protection against myocardial inflammation, ER stress, and apoptosis compared to valsartan alone.
Should not change DCM practice; leaves open whether ARNI superiority over valsartan translates to patients.
The present study is designed to determine the effect of LCZ696 on DCM in rats and investigate the underlying mechanism involved. Diabetes was induced by feeding rats with a high-fat diet for six weeks following a single injection of STZ (30 mg/kg). Diabetic rats were divided into three groups (n = 10). LCZ696 and valsartan treatment was started two weeks after diabetic induction and continued for eight weeks. At the end of the treatment, serum and cardiac tissues were analyzed by RT-PCR, Western blot, and ELISA kits. LCZ696 and valsartan ameliorated DCM progression by inhibiting AGEs formation at activity levels; pro-apoptotic markers (BAX/Bcl2 ratio and caspase-3) in mRNA and protein expressions, the NF-κB at mRNA; and protein levels associated with the restoration of elevated proinflammatory cytokines such as the TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β at the activity level. Furthermore, LCZ696 and valsartan contribute to restoring the induction of ER stress parameters (GRP78, PERK, eIF2a, ATF4, and CHOP) at mRNA and protein levels. LCZ696 and valsartan attenuated DCM by inhibiting the myocardial inflammation, ER stress, and apoptosis through AGEs/NF-κB and PERK/CHOP signaling cascades. Collectively, the present results reveal that LCZ696 had a more protective solid effect against DCM than valsartan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belali et al. (2022) studied Diabetic cardiomyopathy (n=30). LCZ696 vs. Valsartan and diabetic control was evaluated on Myocardial inflammation, ER stress, and apoptosis. LCZ696 provided greater protection against diabetic cardiomyopathy than valsartan by inhibiting myocardial inflammation, ER stress, and apoptosis through AGEs/NF-κB and PERK/CHOP signaling cascades.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: