Evaluates aortic balloon occlusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, indicating potential improvements in cerebral and coronary perfusion.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac arrest (CA) remains a major health burden with poor survival and poor neurological outcomes despite decades of advances in resuscitation science. Although high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation is essential, it provides only limited cerebral and coronary perfusion, and current strategies relying on high-dose epinephrine may adversely affect cerebral microcirculation. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has emerged as a potential adjunct to improve coronary and cerebral perfusion without compromising microvascular blood flow. Although animal studies and small human case series suggest physiological and clinical benefits of REBOA in CA, randomised clinical trials are lacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: and near-infrared spectroscopy values as well as causes of death and vascular complications related to the intervention. Statistical analyses will be performed on a modified intention-to-treat basis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol (Version 2.1, 11.02.2026) was approved by the Cantonal Ethics Committee of Cantone Bern (2025-D0108). Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07434726.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaube et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: