Engineering geopolymer composites (EGC) are a promising low-carbon and highly durable composite material. However, the high cost of materials hinders its engineering application. To address this challenge, this study investigates the use of cost-effective PP fibers to partially or completely replace PE fibers, and develops an economical hybrid PE/PP-EGC. Axial tensile experiments were conducted on PE/PP-EGC with different PP fiber replacement ratios (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%) to investigate the effect of PP fiber replacement ratios on the tensile behaviour of PE/PP-EGC. Economic feasibility of PE/PP-EGC is also evaluated. The results show that when the replacement ratio is below 75%, PE/PP-EGC still exhibits pseudo-strain hardening and multiple cracking characteristics. As the replacement ratio increases, the crack control ability of EGC decreases, resulting in an increase in the average crack width and a decrease in the crack density. PE/PP-EGC with a replacement ratio of 50% has a highest ultimate tensile strain (9.71%), which is 68% higher than that of PE-EGC, while the tensile strength is only reduced by 15%. Furthermore, PE/PP-EGC with a replacement ratio of 50% exhibits the highest tensile strength, ultimate tensile strain, and tensile strain energy per unit cost. Based on the experimental data and theoretical derivation, this study proposes a semi-empirical bilinear tensile constitutive model of PE/PP-EGC and verifies its reliability. It is recommended to use a 50% replacement ratio of PP fibers for PE/PP-EGC, which offers optimal tensile mechanical performance, along with outstanding comprehensive economical performance. These research findings provide important insights into the design and application of low-cost and high-performance engineering geopolymer composites, and could have significant implications for the development of sustainable and durable infrastructure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: